Uncategorized

The Rise of Biodiversity Credits: A New Chapter in the Voluntary Carbon Market

The voluntary carbon market (VCM) is evolving quickly. While carbon credits remain the backbone, a new and exciting trend is gaining momentum in 2025: biodiversity credits. These credits go beyond carbon reduction to protect and restore ecosystems—linking climate action with nature conservation.

What Are Biodiversity Credits?

Biodiversity credits are units that represent measurable conservation outcomes such as:
* Protection of endangered species.
* Restoration of forests, wetlands, and mangroves.
* Preservation of habitats that safeguard ecosystem services.

Unlike carbon credits, which are measured in tons of CO₂ reduced or removed, biodiversity credits focus on the health and resilience of ecosystems.

Why Are They Trending?

  1. Beyond Carbon: Companies want to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss at the same time.
  2. Global Push: The UN Global Biodiversity Framework (COP15) committed to protecting 30% of land and seas by 2030—creating demand for measurable biodiversity outcomes.
  3. Market Growth: In early 2025, pilot biodiversity credit projects launched in Costa Rica, Kenya, and Indonesia, attracting strong investor interest.
  4. Price Premiums: Buyers are paying higher prices for credits that deliver dual benefits—climate + nature.

According to Ecosystem Marketplace, biodiversity-linked credits could represent a multi-billion-dollar opportunity by 2030.

How Biodiversity Credits Complement Carbon Credits

Instead of replacing carbon credits, biodiversity credits are designed to work alongside them.
A forest conservation project can issue both:

  – Carbon credits for avoided deforestation.

  – Biodiversity credits for protecting species habitat.

This creates a stacked benefits model, rewarding projects for the full scope of environmental value they deliver.

What It Means for Buyers

For companies, biodiversity credits offer:

Stronger ESG storytelling – linking climate goals with nature protection.

Brand differentiation – consumers increasingly value biodiversity-positive actions.

Risk mitigation – resilient ecosystems reduce climate and supply chain risks.

Some multinational brands have already begun co-investing in biodiversity alongside carbon projects, positioning themselves as leaders in nature-positive transitions.

Looking Ahead

The next 2–3 years will determine whether biodiversity credits move from niche to mainstream. Key challenges include:

* Developing robust standards for measurement and verification.

* Avoiding double-counting with carbon credits.

* Ensuring credits deliver real, additional, and lasting benefits.

Still, the momentum is undeniable. As the climate crisis and biodiversity crisis are deeply interconnected, biodiversity credits could become the next big wave in voluntary markets.

Final Thought

Carbon credits may have started the movement, but biodiversity credits are expanding the horizon. For businesses, investing in nature-positive projects isn’t just good for the planet—it’s becoming a strategic advantage.

The voluntary carbon market is no longer just about carbon. It’s about carbon + nature + communities—and biodiversity credits are leading that transformation.

References:

https://www.naturefinance.net/biodiversity-credits/
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/biodiversity-credits-nature-carbon/
https://www.naturefinance.net/biodiversity-credits/
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/biodiversity-credits-nature-carbon/
https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/

The Rise of Carbon Removals: Divergent Corporate Strategies

As the world shifts towards net-zero planning, carbon removals (CDR) have become a crucial component of corporate climate strategies. However, companies are adopting different approaches to tackle this challenge. In this blog, we’ll explore the various strategies being employed and the implications for businesses.

Why Carbon Removals Matter

Science-aligned pathways require deep value-chain cuts and durable removals to neutralize residual emissions. The Oxford Offsetting Principles (2024) recommend a staged transition from avoidance/reduction credits to 100% removals by 2050, emphasizing durable storage solutions like mineralization, DACCS, and BECCS.

The Role of Technology

Advancements in technologies like Direct Air Capture (DAC) and Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) are critical for scaling up carbon removals. Companies like Climeworks and Carbon Engineering are already leveraging DAC to capture CO2 from the atmosphere, while others are exploring BECCS as a viable solution for negative emissions. As these technologies mature, costs are expected to decrease, making carbon removals more accessible to businesses.

Divergent Strategies

Companies are pursuing different playbooks:

  1. Pioneers: Anchoring multi-million-tonne, high-durability contracts to jump-start supply.
  2. Hedgers: Diversifying portfolios and financing structures to mitigate risks.
  3. Platform builders: Creating guardrails to bring their ecosystems along cautiously.
  4. Cautious followers: Limiting action to “beyond-value-chain mitigation” (BVCM) while prioritizing internal abatement.Integrity Frameworks

Integrity Frameworks

Recent updates to integrity frameworks provide guidance:

  1. SBTi: Encourages near-term BVCM alongside required reduction targets, with removals for neutralizing true residuals.
  2. Oxford Offsetting Principles: Call for a staged transition to 100% removals by 2050.
  3. ICVCM’s Core Carbon Principles: Provide a quality floor for credits.
  4. VCMI’s Claims Code: Defines how companies can credibly communicate credit usage.

The Road Ahead

As companies navigate the complex landscape of carbon removals, strategic divergence is expected. However, with integrity frameworks maturing, businesses must prioritize durable removals and credible communication to achieve net-zero goals.

Contact here